Poverty (India)

13th March 2009, the street was littered as ever, a pack of sheep were grazing on papers, plastics and spoiled vegetables and fruits, polythene spread along the road-side to display Chinese electronics, coins and clothes, thelas of belpuri, badam and coconut sellers shouting out their offer. Taxis, tempos and rickshaws honking to find their way and customers, in the street clustered with people and vehicle. Girls carrying baby-sister on their hips with an arm around her and another to grab the shirts or the pants of the every passing Apa and Ama to remind her state of existence in the maidan of activities. Beggars have always been a shortage in the Bhutan and Jaigoan on the other hand is blessed. Awed by their state of existence, sparing from five to hundred Ngultrums for these children is an automatic gesture for Bhutanese. These children live in the street major part of 24 by seven and in the slumps at night. Their houses are huts and holes made from the polythene collected from the garbage bins and dump in the town. I have seen them residing in the rejected- suppose to be an underground sewerage tunnel in the suburb. Most of these children have their parents with regular jobs in the constructions sites, restaurants and other business entities in the town including red light work. Children are send to the streets for extra income. Most of these families are believed to have displaced and migrated from Bangladesh for some reason or the other. Every time these children bump for money, their clients in order to avoid the scene they instantly they give them whatever changes one could find inside purse or pockets. If you don’t they would not leave you, if you do more will follow you. There is no way that you could avoid making a scene. It is a bazaar for enthusiastic shopper, sellers and hawkers. One could find anything in Jaigoan, when I say everything I mean everything. Cheap food to luxury car and just in case stock ran out the goods get delivered the next day. No one will be disappointed. As much as Jaigoan is a greatest example of enterprise and entrepreneurs it is also a place for a displaced people who are struggling to survive. It is also a place for one who is not familiar with poverty at a close distance. I have known this Indian town and few others for the last many years. Danny Boyele in his Slumdog Millionare has portrayed slumps of India to a commendable degree, but nothing like this author-The author is a retired Vice President from C-I-L Inc. and has lived in Canada for the past 34 years. A graduate of Punjab University and University of Missouri ; Rolla , USA , the author is a former investment strategies analyst and international relations manager. POVERTY AND SLUMS IN INDIA – IMPACT OF CHANGING ECONOMIC LANDSCAPE Guest Column by Hari Sud Western media headlines as usual are as follows – twenty five percent of Indians live on less than a dollar a day and seventy percent live on less than two dollars a day. The forgoing was the headline of May 9, 2005 in a major international newspaper. Others headlines are not any less mischievous. These are all meaningless analysis. It does not reflect that same amount of money has differing values in different places. A more acceptable and bit accurate description of incomes in countries is Purchase Power Parity (PPP), which is, pricing identical products and services as needed by the local population in different countries, thus establishing a new and a more equitable exchange rate. The foregoing is applicable mostly to tradable goods. The PPP will put India’s GDP at $3.7 Trillion. This will raise daily monies of twenty five percent of Indians at the lowest rung of the society to seven dollars. The latter is still low but is much higher than the Western media would like to project. The forgoing is not the point; the point is that poverty is a major shame in India’s otherwise decent, scientifically advanced, peace loving and at times turbulent image. Poverty creates slums and slums breed hopelessness and crime. Hence it needs to be tackled as an integral part of economic development. The key question that arises - will the current hype in economical development in India alter the landscape for the very poor? The answer is that, not much will change in next 20 to 25 years. The real impact will be felt later than twenty-five years. That is when 8% growth trajectory will take the PPP daily income of the very poor in India from seven dollars to forty dollars. By then, a $20 Trillion GDP economy (PPP basis) and $600 billion in exports (year 2001 basis) will add one hundred and fifty million jobs, of which forty to fifty million will go to the very poor segment of the society. This general prosperity will not only put food on the table but will add to better living, better housings etc. In the intervening period of 25 years, rising income levels will definitely add to the exodus from the slums to planned living areas. The forgoing also requires massive governmental effort to house people properly. Let us examine this issue of poverty and slums in Indian cities and its relationship to the betterment of economic conditions of the masses, a bit further? What Causes Slums in the Cities in the First Place? It is vicious cycle of population growth, opportunities in the cities (leading to migration to the cities), poverty with low incomes, tendency to be closer to work hence occupying any land in the vicinity etc. The key reason out of all is the slow economic progress. After independence in 1947, commercial and industrial activity needed cheap labor in the cities. Plentiful was available in the rural area. They were encouraged to come to cities and work. People, who migrated to the cities and found work, brought their cousins and rest of the families to the cities. Unable to find housing and afford it, they decided to build their shelter closer to work. First, one shelter was built, then two and then two thousand and then ten thousand and on and on. Conniving governments provided electricity and drinking water. Politicians looked at the slums as vote bank. They organized these unauthorized dwellers into a political force; hence slums took a bit of a permanent shape. More slums developed as more population moved to the cities. By mid sixties Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi, and all other large cities were dotted with slums. Very poor people live in slums. They are not the only one dwelling there. Fairly well to do people also reside there. They are either offspring of the slum dwellers that found education and an occupation. They have prospered but are unable to find affordable housing, hence have continued to stay in the shantytowns. Others are avoiding paying rent and property taxes. The latter is more often the case. It is not unusual that in the dirtiest of slums, where misery prevails that TV sets, refrigerators and radios are also blaring music. This is quite a contrast from the image which one gets in the media or from the opportunist politicians. India’s capital of Delhi has a million and a half out of fourteen million living in slums. Mumbai is worst with greater percentage living in slums. Other big urban centers have done no better. Newly built cities like Chandigarh and surrounding towns where shantytowns could have been avoided altogether have now slums. The forgoing is India’s shame despite huge progress. How will the growing Economy impact Poverty and the Slum dwellers? As stated above, 8% growth rate of Indian economy will push per capita GDP to $2,000 level in about twenty to twenty-five years (PPP per capita GDP will be much higher). The forgoing presupposes that the population does not explode in the near future but continue a healthy 1.5 to 2% growth. That is where the magic equilibrium of prosperity and desire to live a better life begins. These two together could end poverty and slums. With availability of affordable housing and jobs, slum dwelling is the last thought on people’s mind. On the other hand if the above does not happen then slums dwellers will triple in 25 years and so will the poverty. Delhi will have four and a half million-slum dwellers. Kolkata and Mumbai will have even bigger numbers. India’s shame will have no end. To avoid that, India’s economy has to remain at a high state of growth. Jobs created by the economic growth, hence higher incomes are key criteria for poverty reduction and slum elimination. The foregoing together with the current urban renewal in progress in the urban areas today will give cities in India a new look. Higher incomes will create a demand for in-expensive housing, which will have to be met with innovative use of land and building techniques. Government provided housing would be a great failure as it has been elsewhere in the world. Instead sufficient cash has to be placed in the people’s hands together with in-expensive land that people’s housing program become efficient and affordable. In addition slum living has to be made unattractive with land taxes and denial of social services. Slum colonies, which opt out of current hopelessness, should get a better deal in housing which replaces the slums. This followed with rapidly growing rural economy will kill migration. That will also reduce pressure on housing. No single policy has ever brought an end to poverty and slums. It is a concerted effort and better policies, which will end it. No country in the world has ever been able to end poverty and slums completely. That includes the richest nation of the world – USA. The point is that if economy progresses and special effort is made to uplift the poor, poverty and slums will be overtaken by better economic conditions of the people. How did US Tackle its Slums? US had its share of poverty and slums in around the immigrant dominated cities. New York and Boston had great amount of poverty and slums at the turn of the twentieth century. These slums worsened further with the arrival of newly liberated African-American population from Deep South. The era pictures give a glimpse of everyday life and it is not pretty. People without jobs and with no prospects crowded cities in the North. A new word, Ghetto was coined, which described these places. Immigrant from different background or race crowded together and gave rise to Ghettos. At that time US did not have control over its economy and Civil War debt and additional monies borrowed to rehabilitate agriculture and commerce after the Civil War was unpaid. As twentieth century progressed a concerted effort was made to clean up the Ghettos and push people inland with free grant of land and promise of prosperity. Industrial Revolution, which was slow in reaching America from Europe, finally arrived. And it made the difference. It provided the much-needed jobs to the immigrants and colored. Also, free land in the West gave rise to food self-sufficiency and paying off of all Civil War and post Civil War debts. First World War gave US economy a boost and America joined the select group of countries of Europe in prosperity. Poverty by the end of the Second World War was a thing of the past. In just fifty years, i.e. by 1950, US were nation of 160 million souls, all prosperous and all well employed (forget the habitual lazy). That does not mean that all the Ghettos disappeared. They continued to exist. They exist today, but on a much lower scale. These are not eyesores. One critical factor which eliminated slums and poverty in US was quadrupling of the US economy from 1900 to 1940. A free wheeling economy created industrial giants and a super rich class. Need for war material during the WWII resulted in creation of huge industrial infrastructure and innovation. Post war reconstruction in Europe added greater impetus to the economy. General well being of the people living in the poorer section of the cities dramatically improved. US raced ahead of Europe and are still ahead, 60 years after the WWII. In most cities, ghettos disappeared or shrunk. Urban renewal and building boom in last sixty years has completely changed the landscape of the country. There is a parallel here. Poverty and slums in India are at the same level as they were in beginning of the twentieth century in America. Economic growth over fifty years eliminated them. It is possible in India too if the economy sustains the 8% growth trajectory. Slums and the Great Briton Great Briton was a great big slum before they became a colonial power in the nineteenth century. For eight hundred years prior, until 1800s, Great Briton was an agrarian society, where the lord lived happily in his Manor and Castles and the masses lived in a great squalor. Slums were everywhere. London had the biggest slums. Colonization brought prosperity and prosperity brought in a huge effort to improve the lot of the people and clean up of the cities. That is when the unemployed and slum dwellers were pushed to newly developing industrial hubs of Sheffield, Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester. Compared to that Delhi, Kolkata were heavens. First slums in Kolkata appeared in 1850-70 as a result of systematic destruction of textile industry in Bengal and destruction of trading infrastructure in and around Kolkata. Slums elsewhere followed. It took all the Victorian age from 1825 to 1900 to vanish poverty and slums in England. Their GDP multiplied 8 times over this period. British factories produced goods and services which were sold at profit in the in the colonies. Work for everybody in England was the cornerstone of building well-serviced cities. The point is that reduction of poverty and slums follow closely with economic development. Faster the economic development, sooner will the poverty vanish and with it, the slums. How did China handle its Poverty and Slums? Chinese had a unique way of making slums disappear from its urban centers. Permit system to live in a city or in a particular neighborhood was introduced just after the Communist took control in 1949. That means that a migration of rural population to the urban areas in search of jobs was arrested. In addition the war ravaged eastern provinces where rural population had moved to the cities and into the slums, were emptied out. Nobody questioned Mao Tse Tung’s wisdom; hence he had a free hand. People were permitted to return to their homes in the cities only after proof of their residency had been established. Outsiders were sent back to their own homes and land in the rural area. Future residency in the cities was permitted on a permit basis only. Hence the major problem of unplanned urban squatting was prevented. Even today the foregoing policy continues. The FDI built cities of Guangdong province carry on with the permit system established in 1949. In order to move there, a person has to have a job and place to reside. The latter could be a factory provided bunk bed. This prevents urban squatters. The above is no comparison to how poverty was vanished in UK, US and elsewhere. Major economic progress in last 20 years has re-invigorated the cities with investment and reconstruction. Whether the same is true in the China’s rural areas is a debatable issue. China likes to pretend that poverty has been removed. Published reports state otherwise. (http://www.economist.com/World/asia/displayStory.cfm?story_id=5636460) Urban Renewal In India Urban renewal is in progress in India in a big way for the last 50 years. The British starved cities in India of the funds for two hundred years. They only built regal palaces for themselves in Delhi, Shimla and Kolkota. No new funds were made available to the people to renew and rebuild, hence Moghul Delhi presented a decaying and a rundown look, when they finally left India in 1947. The problem got compounded with migration of people from rural areas. Expanding industry and commerce needed them hence migration was encouraged. Thus urban slums and squatting began in a big way. Today, some estimates place 10 to 15% of Delhi population as slum dwellers. Slums in Kolkata predate Delhi slums. So do the Mumbai slums. They all began the same way – people’s livelihood was destroyed or they were invited to work in factories without adequate housing. The problem grew acute with huge population growth after 1950. From 1950 to today, cities lacked funds to renew themselves and help build additional housing. People lacked adequate jobs hence are caught in the poverty cycle. Only recently a huge building and construction boom has started in all cities in India. Whereas governments are concentrating on building infrastructure and industrial base, private construction is building work places, shopping districts and housing for the middle class. The poor and slum dwellers are not there in any building equation. Cheap housing projects are lowest in the category. Hence slum dwelling has become a way of life. How Long the Poor have to wait? If the experience elsewhere is a guide then poverty, slums and urban squat will be a diminishing phenomenon, if the rapid economic progress keeps its pace. Today we would have smaller of the slums, had economic policies of the present were in place 50 years back. Only now, all signs point to a rapidly rising GDP together with rising per capita GDP. With rise in income level, tendency to head to the slums has lessened. Die-hard slum dwellers who wish to pay no taxes and spend nothing on housing will most certainly continue to stay there. Others will prefer to move out. This is a normal phenomenon. It happened in US and elsewhere. It will happen in India too. An economic equilibrium has not been reached in the society yet, where enough money in people’s pocket will persuade them to vacate the slums. This won’t we reached for another 20 to 25 years. By about middle of this period with increased availability of housing and higher incomes, the growth in slum dwelling will be arrested. Decline will begin only when much higher incomes are reached (as stated above), provided India does not make the mistake of regularizing the slums/bustees with land tenure on tenable land and other amenities. That is a sure fire method to keep the slums going. People will always wait for free grant of land ownership even if these grants never materialize. Even the possibility of this ever happening in a distant future will keep the slum dwellers in the slums. Conclusion Poverty, slums and urban squat are not going to go away in next 20 to 25 years. Reversal of this phenomenon will begin after sufficient economic progress had been made. Eight percent GDP growths is a good sign. With quadrupled GDP in 25 years, there is a good chance that the new and upcoming generation may stay away from slum dwelling. It may take another 25 years before the slums are vacated. (The Views expressed are his own and above them are mine.) Image above is originally uploaded by Carf, Brazil.